Hello. I'm Larelle, a 40 year old ex-pat Australian living in the UK with my partner. I like music, TV, films and books. I'm also an amateur bird-watcher. I hope you like my blog.
October 4th, 2010

"

Atheism comes into rather a bad press and I suppose I’d rather describe myself as a humanist. I don’t believe there is a God. If I were to believe in a god l would believe in gods. I think monotheism is the really ghastly thing. That is the absolutely staggering, to me, misapprehension. I can perfectly see why anybody might imagine that each thing, each thing that grows, each phenomenon that accompanies us on our journey through life, the sky, the mountains… I can imagine why man would wish to endow them with an inner something, an inner animus that they would call the god of that thing. I can see that. It’s a beautiful and charming way of looking at it and I can understand the Greek idea that there are these principles of lightening or of war or of wisdom and to embody them, to personify them into a Athena or Aries or whichever god you want makes enormous sense, but to say that there is one only god who made it all…What? Why? Who said? Where? Come on. And I love how when people watch I don’t know, David Attenborough or Discovery Planet type thing where you see the absolute phenomenal majesty and complexity and bewildering beauty of nature and you stare at it and then… and somebody next to you goes, “And how can you say there is no God?” “Look at that.” And then five minutes later you’re looking at the lifecycle of a parasitic worm whose job is to bury itself in the eyeball of a little lamb and eat the eyeball from inside while the lamb dies in horrible agony and then you turn to them and say, “Yeah, where is your God now?” You know? I mean you can’t just say there is a God because well, the world I beautiful. You have to account for bone cancer in children. You have to account for the fact that almost all animals in the wild live under stress with not enough to eat and will die violent and bloody deaths. There is not any way that you can just choose the nice bits and say that means there is a God and ignore the true fact of what nature is. The wonder of nature must be taken in its totality and it is a wonderful thing. It is absolutely marvelous and the idea that an atheist or a humanist if you want to put it that way, doesn’t marvel and wonder at reality, at the way things are, is nonsensical. The point is we wonder all the way. We don’t just stop and say “that which I cannot understand I will call God”, which is what mankind has done historically. That’s to say God was absolutely everything a thousand or two thousand years ago because we understood almost nothing about the natural world, so it could all be God and then as we understood more God receded and receded and receded, so suddenly now he is barely anywhere. He is just in those things we don’t understand, which are important, but I think it just is such an insult to humanity. The Greeks got it right. The Greeks understood perfectly that if there were divine beings they are capricious, unkind, malicious mostly, temperamental, envious and mostly deeply unpleasant because that you can say well yes, all right, if there is going to be god or gods then you have to admit that they’re very at the very least capricious. They’re certainly not consistent. They’re certainly not all loving. I mean really it’s just not good enough.

I think philosophy is a really important dimension, but I think in our age we tend to be rather sloppy about it. I believe in kindness and niceness and lots of spiritual things, but the real intellectual rigor and quest of logic is something that I’m afraid takes incredibly hard work and we live in an age in which hard work is if not actively deprecated or denigrated it is run away from or ignored. It’s sort of people frown at you and say, “Well, that’s a bit dull and stupid. Why can’t we just short circuit it and talk about spirit?” Well yeah, you can say spirit, but if you think that’s philosophy and if you think that’s good enough…

The most important philosophy, I think, is that even if it isn’t true you must absolutely assume there is no afterlife. You cannot for one second I think, abrogate the responsibility of believing that this is it because if you think you’re going to have an eternity in which you can talk to Mozart and Chopin and Schopenhauer on a cloud and learn stuff and really get to grips with knowledge and understanding and so you won’t bother now. I think it’s a terrible terrible mistake.

If we empower ourselves with responsibility over our actions, responsibility over our destinies and responsibility for directing and maintaining and creating our own ethical and moral frameworks, which is the most important thing really isn’t it because perhaps the greatest insult to humanism is this idea that mankind needs a god in order to have a moral framework. There is a very clear way of demonstrating logically how absurd that is because the warrant for that logical framework, for that moral framework that comes from God is always tested against man’s own morals and it’s a complicated argument, but the idea that we don’t know right from wrong, but we have to take it from words put down in a book two, three, four, five, six thousand years ago and dictated to rather hotheaded neurotic desert tribes is just insulting. if there were a God he would want us to be better spirited than to take his word for everything. Wouldn’t he? If he gave us free will would he really want us to say, “No, I have to abide by everything that’s written in this book, all the laws of circumcision and of eating and of… and what to do with menstruating women?” I mean, “I’m going to obey those written down there.” “I won’t think for myself because that’s not required of me.” Come on. It’s just not good enough and you know I have no quarrel with individuals who are devout and who have faith. I don’t want to mock them. I really don’t, but damned if I’m going to be told by them what to do with my body or damned if I’m going to have the extraordinary battles won by enlightenment over the past 400 years, to have those battles abdicated by a new dark ages. you know. The battle lines must be drawn.

"

 —  Stephen Fry (via tumblrpigeon)

(via triskaidecagon)

Tags:  Stephen Fry  religion  theology  atheism  humanism 
Permalink  | 91 notes
Next post »
Short URL: http://tmblr.co/Z8L26y1A0WPr

Notes:

    1. therearemanybroomstoaccio reblogged this from nolwe-clevercloggs-coxon
    2. adgcfad reblogged this from mycroftsumbrella
    3. thoselittlewords reblogged this from ovarycat
    4. tipthewink reblogged this from ovarycat
    5. leucocrystal reblogged this from roblives4love
    6. semillamala reblogged this from funkology
    7. jetaimerai reblogged this from sulu
    8. alumnus reblogged this from funkology
    9. jawsyjaws reblogged this from vesperdomino
    10. fuckyeahpali reblogged this from mycroftsumbrella
    11. mycroftsumbrella reblogged this from samwinchestersdickofdoom
    12. ovarycat reblogged this from sulu and added:
      I was reading this and thinking “Oh wow, this is so poignant,” then got to the bottom and realized it was a quote from...
    13. vesperdomino reblogged this from sulu
    14. anotherdeadhead reblogged this from sagansapien